Though science fiction tales like Clockwork Orange and Videodrome have toyed with the notion that images from television and movies could rewire people's brains, the idea has always been controversial and unsubstantiated. But now researchers have shown empirically that anything you look at, including movies, changes the the connections between neurons in your brain. In other words, what you see changes your brain at a neurological level. The good news is the parts of your brain devoted to vision can be rewired, which has positive implications for people blinded after strokes. The bad news is that what you see today could have a lasting effect on what you see tomorrow. A particularly powerful negative image might alter your perception of positive images later.

According to a release:

In the study, [Valentin] Dragoi and co-author Diego Gutnisky, a graduate research assistant at The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, measured the effects of visual stimulation on the responses of multiple neurons whose electrical activity was measured simultaneously in animals. They carefully examined the responses of a population of cells in visual cortex to dynamic stimuli, which consisted of movie sequences displayed on a video monitor.

"We provide empirical evidence that brief exposure, or adaptation, to a fixed stimulus causes pronounced changes in the degree of cooperation between individual neurons and an improvement in the efficiency with which the population of cells encodes information," Dragoi and Gutnisky report. "These results are consistent with the 'efficient coding hypothesis' - that is, sensory neurons are adapted to the statistical properties of the stimuli that they are exposed to and with changes in human discrimination performance after adaptation." . . .

While their study focused on how neuronal populations adapt to visual stimulation, the same could hold true for other senses - hearing, smell, taste and touch, Dragoi said. "We're trying to understand how a network of sensory neurons changes its encoding properties to properly represent the environment," he said. "Our results may have general implications for sensory and motor coding in a variety of brain areas."

What's truly interesting about this study is that images from film seem to remold our brains as much as real-world ones. So if people watch a lot of violent movies, it's actually possible that the neural links formed as a result will influence what they see in reality. Note that this doesn't mean it would make people more violent -- it might just make them perceive violence more readily, or might cause them to interpret things as being more violent than they are.

Read More...

It might look kinda grey and boring, but the tiny ring in that image is a world-beater: it measures just five microns across, and is only 300 nanometers thick. That's very, very tiny indeed. So, it won't be going around anyone's finger as a symbol of undying love... but it may be a key component in single-photon detectors and quantum computing, which makes it very cool indeed.

Shown last week at the American Physical Society, the ring was actually produced in the University of Melbourne, and is crafted from synthetic diamond material. It's designed to be a component in a device that detects single photons, which in turn has a role to play in quantum computing. That's the nifty technology that uses strange things like photon-entanglement and data bits that are neither zero or one. One day it'll may make super-computers even more ridiculously powerful than they already are, for, you know, all sorts of cryptography and other funky math.

If that's too much science for you, think of the ring as just an amazing bit of engineering that is one twentieth the width of a single human hair. Neat, eh?

Read More...


Pownce founder Leah Culver has made more geeks go wild than we can count. For starters: Daniel Burka of Digg; LiveJournal founder Brad Fitzpatrick; and Justin.tv's Kyle Vogt. They're all history, however. One tipster confirms our suspicions that Culver and Flickr's Cal Henderson are "definitely dating." But another writes:

I tried to hit on Leah Culver at a party not too long ago but that ended in EPIC FAIL. Apparently she was dating Andy Smith from Jaiku at the time. I have no idea if that has changed, but I wouldn't doubt it.
People, we're sure you're already realize this calls for a poll to settle the matter. Please help Leah pick the right man.

Read More...


If you make your living publishing content on the Internet, you live and die by the pageview. One way to drive huge amounts of traffic to your site is through "social news" sites like Digg. If I write something interesting, the theory goes, someone may submit my article to Digg. If it gets enough votes, it hits the front page and I suddenly have enough money to buy a new hibachi. The reality: I often submit stories I've written myself, or get friends to do it, and I then harangue coworkers to vote for my story on Digg. Digg has been making it harder to score this way by detecting how "diverse" your voters are. If it's the same old gang Digging your story every time, you get downgraded. But there is one virtually foolproof way to beat the system: throw tons of traffic at your Digg link.

By sending thousands of his readers to the Digg page, Curtis singlehandedly pushed the story to Digg's homepage Success! Instant traffic and a new grill for me. So, is there any way Digg can account for this? Not easily. It's difficult to tell "authentic" Diggs from "gamed" Diggs when you have thousands of readers showing up at a page out of the blue. The site could check referring links and discount the votes if a ton of clicks come from one place -- but it's not exactly spam. It's almost the same as using Digg's own "shout" mechanism to ask your friends to Digg your link.

I can't wait to hear from all kinds of so-called "social media" consultants about why this strategy won't work for their clients. Here's a question: If they're so smart, why aren't they tight with Drew?

Read More...


Google decorated its logo with a St. Patrick's Day doodle today, March 17, the traditional date on which the medieval missionary is honored. Unfortunately, the Pope shifted the holiday to last Saturday, the 15th, to prevent the holiday from falling during Holy Week. We suspect most observers will be too busy drinking green beer to notice, however. Also, it looks like they forgot the "E".

Read More...

When toy manufacturers make talking toys, they use the cheapest chips and speakers possible: 4-kilohertz audio samples played through a 30-cent piezo buzzer would be an extravagance in this industry. The makers profit when it comes to bean-counting. But they lose when the low quality sounds are misheard by the unscrupulous, the stupid and those who simply hear what they want to hear. Accordingly, here's our gallery of the most chilling, offensive and/or ridiculous examples of inadvertently nasty-talking toys.


Elmo Wants You to Kill Yourself, James






The victim's mom says "Kill James" is "exactly" what it's saying, and describes how distraught she was after hearing it.

It sounds like typical garbled toy-speak, with a questioning tone at odds with the imperative suggestion it's claimed to emit. Once you're told it's "Kill James," however, it's hard to imagine what else it could be — but always remember Pavarotti's classic performance of "Elephants, Yes!"

This particular toy can be also be custom-programmed with new statements, suggesting that it might be easy to get it to say bad things, either by design or because of bugs.

Leapfrog Alphabet Pal Just Wants to Relax



If you can barely make out what it's alleged to be saying, let alone what it's supposed to be saying, you wouldn't be alone. Maybe we should all just frackin' chill. Here's more video, from an NBC affiliate. You'll notice a theme here: reporters having to explain to the viewer what something is saying, or beeping it out so you have to take their word for it.


Heeeeeere's Elmo! Again!



In another "Local news special," the Potty Time With Elmo talking book is heard to make a startling request: "Who wants to die?"

What is it with Elmo and the fallibility of the flesh? Existential Elmo needs to know.

The sound here is so vague and poorly recorded it could just as easily be "Who wants to try" or "Poop wants to fly." Perhaps this is the perfect example of Rorschach audio.

I've Got a Teletubby and I'm Prepared to Use it



"I've got a gun teletubby toast." Yeah, that's definitely what it's programmed to say.

Fans will know that this revolting little thing is saying "Again Again!," as it does on the show, but that doesn't stop an ABC reporter claiming otherwise, as if it's settled fact.

Here's a unicorn chaser, of sorts: a teletubby openly touting the species' much-ballyhooed gay agenda.



Bratz Dolls Are Right Little Brats



Somewhere amid the stream of sonic garbage pouring from this nasty little toy is, some assert, foul language. CNN adds the beeps to make sure you can't make up your own mind — but at least know where the trash talk is supposed to be.


Little Mermaid to Little Girls: "You're A Slut"

There is, unfortunately, no video or audio to go with this story about the Little Mermaid that made unwarranted assumptions about its owner. Disney subsidiary ABC's story does, at least, point out that to make it say "slut," the user has to press the speech button fast enough to deliberately garble multiple statements — and that neither they nor an independent analyst could reproduce it without a lot of effort.

Math Is Hard — For a Doll

What better way to sign off than a doll saying something horrible by design? Talking Barbie, most infamously, chirped "math class is tough," precipitating a crisis that set feminism back at least 50 days.

Kill Mommy, but Only in English

The ur-Chucky is 1982's legendary "Kill Mommy" doll, which turned out to be a mis-imported Spanish-language product chirping "Quiero a Mami." It's now hard to find online evidence of this particular example of suburban mothers looking for something to be scandalized by. But it's still the original trash-talking toy scandal.





Read More...


Urban astro-nerds, rejoice! The smog and lights of the city will obscure your view of the heavens no more. And your star photography will twinkle. Now you can go online to access high-quality scopes at dark-sky sites worldwide and order them to take photos for you — cheaply or for free, and at decent resolution. It may take some preparation, but even if the results aren't exactly Hubble-icious, there's something out-of-this-world about playing astronomer for a night.

Bradford Robotic Telescope
www.Telescope.org
Telescope 14-inch-diameter Schmidt-Cassegrain
Location Tenerife, Canary Islands
Field of view From the north celestial pole to 52 degrees south
Pictures back in Days, sometimes weeks
Results 1,056 x 1,027-pixel color or black-and-white JPEGs
Cost Free

Micro-Observatory
mo-www.cfa.harvard.edu/MicroObservatory
Telescope 6-inch-diameter Maksutov
Location Cambridge, Massachusetts, and Amado, Arizona
Field of view Northern celestial hemisphere to 48 degrees south
Pictures back in Days, often overnight
Results 650 x 500-pixel black-and-white GIFs
Cost Free

Seeing in the Dark
www.pbs.org/seeinginthedark/explore-the-sky
Telescope 14-inch-diameter Schmidt-Cassegrain
Location Mayhill, New Mexico
Field of view Northern celestial hemisphere to about 45 degrees south
Pictures back in Days to weeks
Results 512 x 512-pixel black-and-white JPEGs
Cost Free

Slooh
www.slooh.com
Telescope Two 14-inch-diameter Schmidt-Cassegrains — one for planets, the other for deep space
Location Tenerife, Canary Islands, and Santiago, Chile
Field of view Northern and southern celestial hemispheres
Pictures back in Seconds
Results 800 x 600-pixel color JPEGs
Cost $100 per year for unlimited images

Read More...